|
On
June 30th, several newspapers carried a report from the
Gaza, Palestine, similar to that of Joel Greenberg’s
description in the Chicago Tribune:
“Israeli youths had turned a three-story house into a
makeshift outpost, daubing the words ‘Muhammad is a pig’
on a wall—a reference to the Prophet Muhammad.
"Jewish militants went on a stone-throwing spree,
attacking Palestinian homes, drawing volleys of stones.
Israeli soldiers fired shots in the air in a futile
attempt to stop the fighting.
"One
Palestinian youth was wounded in the head by a rock, and
as he lay senseless on the ground, young settlers stoned
him at close range while an Israeli soldier tried to
shield him.
"'Don't touch him, let him die’, shouted one settler in
footage shown on Israeli television. The Palestinian was
transferred to a hospital.”
Compare Greenberg’s account to that by NPR’s Linda
Gradstein:
“Yesterday, another group of extremists in an abandoned
Palestinian building nearby clashed with Israeli
soldiers and with Palestinians, critically wounding a
Palestinian teen-ager. Last night, Israeli soldiers
stormed that building and arrested the 30 activists
inside.” Yes, activists, she calls them.
That’s
it, that’s all. While Gradstein provides intra-Israeli
context, she glosses over this ugly and racist violence
and its relation to the brutal occupation of Palestine.
The Tribune does little better at providing such
context, instead emphasizing the predicaments of
occupying Israeli soldiers and Israeli politicians.
For a
more critical analysis I therefore turn to Israeli
journalist Gideon Levy:
“If
the media had exposed the full scope of the settlers'
deeds over the years - the dubious ways in which they
took over land, the huge budgets they received, their
violent behavior - perhaps they would have been
denounced long ago, as should be done by a healthy
society. Israeli society chose to be cynically
manipulated, and journalists lent a hand.
Never
has there been such an impressive media success here as
that of the (Israeli) right. An enterprise that was
criminal from the outset was depicted as one of high
principles. The rotten fruits of this distorted
description are now placed at our doorstep.”
But
given the above references, I would suggest that
regarding both Israel and Iraq, the same dire conclusion
can be reached for American journalists and our right
wing. It offers little solace to citizens in either
society to claim that theirs is marked by marginally
less journalistic cynicism in the face of overt
political mendacity. |